|
Dear RENEW
Network Friend,
As we begin a new
quadrennium for the United Methodist Church and United Methodist Women, we
find ourselves evaluating the outcomes of General Conference—and surmising
where they will take us.
United Methodist Women
are able to discern what’s ahead by examining communications that come
from the Women’s Division and by studying resources produced for the local
UMW. After all, the Women’s Division is authorized to interpret the
Purpose of United Methodist Women, to recommend program and provide
resources, to serve as the national official policy-making body of the
organization and to appropriate funds received through UMW.
Nowhere is this better
spelled out than the Focus on Local and District Units Handbook: United
Methodist Women 2005-2008. A careful read of this handbook shows a
tight knit, tightly controlled organization highly influenced by the
worldview of the Women’s Division.
The RENEW Network’s
purpose is to encourage renewal and revitalization at the grassroots level
of United Methodist Women and to equip the women of the church to call for
accountability on the part of the Women’s Division in its role as the head
of United Methodist Women. Evaluation of Women’s Division programs,
policies and spending is one means of accomplishing this goal. From our
vantage point, we offer the following observations.
Three issues of
Response magazine following General Conference did not bode well. The
June issue painted a rosy picture of the United Nations, tying the mission
of The United Methodist Church to an institution that is riddled with
scandal and unethical practices, and whose treaties claim advocacy for
women and children while undermining the family, promoting unrestricted
abortion and failing to address many real needs of women. The July issue
on the media showcased an opinionated “expertise” that harangued against
FOX News as a source of “misinformation.” Shades of Re-Imagining along
with New Age mysticism and radical feminism surfaced in the August issue
of Response magazine through individuals cited and books
referenced. Rather than lifting up worthy mystics for us to study, this
issue of Response showcased bogus teachings and dangerous
theologies.
Then came the fall
meeting of the Women’s Division Board of Directors where the Women’s
Division’s participation in the controversial pro-abortion “March for
Women’s Lives” was staunchly defended, where partisan political views were
expressed regarding the upcoming election and where incoming Deputy
General Secretary,
Dr. Janice Love, painted a “portrait of our future.”
Dr. Love’s challenging
speech mentioned both personal and social holiness, yet clearly reinforced
the exclusivity of the Women’s Division’s commitment to social holiness.
Her statements, “some conservative political and religious extremists hope
fervently for our demise”…and, “some extremists see us as a threat to
dominant trends in our society and some churches,” hearkened back to her
responses to interview questions for the position of Deputy General
Secretary.
When asked, “What do
you consider the biggest challenge facing women/women’s organizations
today in society at large?” Dr. Love began, “We live in an era of deeply
embedded conservatism in the United States and across the world…a reality
that undermines any notion that history inevitably progresses to improve
life for all.” When asked the same question regarding the biggest
challenge facing women/women’s organizations today in the church? She
opened her response, “The era in which we live affects many religious
groups, including Christian churches, making them, too, more
conservative. Some ‘fundamentalists’ even strive to impose their
particular religious vision on the whole society, believing that God
commands them to do so. This threatens basic commitments to secularism
and religious pluralism at home and abroad.”
If Dr. Love indeed
sees conservatism in the nation and in the church as the greatest
challenge facing women and women’s organizations today, one can’t help but
wonder just who she places in these categories. Surely, evangelical
Christians within United Methodism, and genuine Christians across other
denominations, would not be mislabeled and marginalized into this
category.
Dr. Janice Love is an
adept communicator and one hopes her talk of finding answers for conflicts
in the church are genuine. The issues that divide us are deep and
serious. It will take more than embracing our diversity, communicating
more conscientiously and finding consensus to resolve our differences.
Our final analysis for
this initial “new quadrennium” comes from a look at the 2005 Reading
Program for United Methodist Women. While numerous titles sent up red
flags for us (we will be reviewing some of these books), two blew us
away. After all the conflict within the church about Bishop Joseph
Sprague’s deviate theology, there was his book Affirmations of a
Dissenter under the Spiritual Growth section! And, if you really want
to know about the evils of capitalism, you could read War, Racism and
Economic Injustice: The Global Ravages of Capitalism by Fidel Castro
himself! Walking through a minefield to find a good book is dangerous for
the women of the church.
What is our “take” at
this early point in the quadrennium? We believe there is continuing cause
for concern about the leadership provided by the Women’s Division. We
encourage you to let your concerns be known. Above all, we encourage you
to move forward toward renewal and revitalization at the local level.
RENEW stands ready to assist you in any way we can. Check out the
resources available to you through RENEW at our web site,
www.renewnetwork.org.
At the recent Good
News Board of Directors meeting, and the RENEW Steering Committee meeting,
we outlined some bold initiatives for the new quadrennium which we will be
sharing with you in detail in the days to come. We anticipate an
expansion of this ministry into new areas and in closer networking,
enabling us to service our network members more effectively. We count on
you to stand with us in prayer and, as you are able, in financial support
to accomplish our ministry vision.
May
God bless our work together.
|
P.S. We
are still processing the responses sent to our last mailing.
This letter is being sent to the same mailing list as last
month. Remember, you don’t have to donate to receive our
mailings—but we do ask that you pray for us, share the
information you receive and contribute as you are able. |
In Christ,
L. Faye Short
President
|